13 Oct 2016
Today I upgrade my ASP.NET Core application from version 1.0 to version 1.0.1 because of a bug in Entity Framework. Right after updating to the latest ASP.NET Core version, I built the project but ended up with the following error in Visual Studio:
Can not find runtime target for framework '.NETFramework,Version=v4.5.1' compatible with one of the target runtimes: 'win10-x64, win81-x64, win8-x64, win7-x64'. Possible causes:
The project has not been restored or restore failed - run dotnet restore
You may be trying to publish a library, which is not supported. Use dotnet pack to distribute libraries.
Fix - Update project.json
After searching around for a few minutes I found issue #2442 on GitHub. This the issue states that you need to update your project.json
and you have two options:
(1). Include the platforms you want to build for explicitly:
"runtimes": {
"win10-x64": {},
"win8-x64": {}
},
(2). Update the reference Microsoft.NETCore.App
to include the type
as platform
:
"Microsoft.NETCore.App": {
"version": "1.0.1",
"type": "platform"
}
Conclusion
For more information on .NET Core Application Deployment you can read the docs. This is again another reason I love that all this work is being done out in the open. It really makes finding issues and bugs of this type easier. Hope that Helps!
08 Jun 2016
After adding a reference to retrieve a Service Fabric Actor to my ASP.NET Core Web API project I got the following error when making the call to create the actor using IMyActor actor = ActorProxy.Create<IMyActor>(actorId, serviceuri);
:
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'ServiceFabricServiceModel, Version=5.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
File name: 'ServiceFabricServiceModel, Version=5.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35'
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Services.Common.FabricServiceConfigSection.Initialize()
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Services.Communication.FabricTransport.Common.FabricTransportSettings.LoadFrom(String sectionName, String filepath, String configPackageName)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Services.Communication.FabricTransport.Common.FabricTransportSettings.TryLoadFrom(String sectionName, FabricTransportSettings& settings, String filepath, String configPackageName)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Services.Communication.FabricTransport.Common.FabricTransportSettings.GetDefault(String sectionName)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Actors.Remoting.FabricTransport.FabricTransportActorRemotingProviderAttribute.CreateServiceRemotingClientFactory(IServiceRemotingCallbackClient callbackClient)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Actors.Client.ActorProxyFactory.CreateServiceRemotingClientFactory(Type actorInterfaceType)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Actors.Client.ActorProxyFactory.GetOrCreateServiceRemotingClientFactory(Type actorInterfaceType)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Actors.Client.ActorProxyFactory.CreateActorProxy[TActorInterface](Uri serviceUri, ActorId actorId, String listenerName)
at Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Actors.Client.ActorProxy.Create[TActorInterface](ActorId actorId, Uri serviceUri, String listenerName)
at Web.Controllers.Controller.<Create>d__1.MoveNext() in
From this stackoverflow answer, it seems that there is currently an issue with the dotnet cli when working with nuget packages that do not explicitly reference assemblies. In this case, it is specifically an issue with Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Services package (version 2.0.217). When the ASP.NET Core publish action occurs, the ServiceFabricServiceModel.dll
does not get copied to the publish folder but it is in the packages folder for the library.
Fixing with a postbuild script in project.json
This will likely be fixed but in the mean time you can fix this issue by adding a postbuild script in the ASP.NET Core RC2 project.json
file. I used xcopy
to copy the file from the packages
folder to the publish directory. Once there, Service Fabric was able to package it up for deployment and everything worked.
In the project.json
file add a scripts command:
{
//...
"scripts": {
"postpublish": [ "xcopy ..\\packages\\Microsoft.ServiceFabric.Services.2.0.217\\lib\\net45\\ServiceFabricServiceModel.dll %publish:OutputPath%" ]
}
}
This will locate packages folder (maybe different for your setup) and copy it to the output folder for the publish command.
08 Jun 2016
This week I ran into an issue when deploying a Service Fabric service where a library file was not being copied to the output directory. Since I am using ASP.NET Core for my API layer in the Service Fabric project, I had to go dig around to figure out how to get the file to copy to the deployment folder during the publishing of the ASP.NET Core application.
note that this solution with project.json may change with as ASP.NET Core moves back to .csproj file
What I learned is that in ASP.NET Core RC 2 you can add scripts to the prepublish
and postpublish
events by adding a scripts
section to the project.json
file. In my case I needed to copy a file to the deployment folder after the rest of the project as built.
{
"buildOptions": {
// ...
}
},
//...
"scripts": {
"prepublish": ["<command1>, <command2>"],
"postpublish": [ "xcopy <pathtofile> %publish:OutputPath%" ]
}
}
Note that you can reference variables like %publish:OutputPath%
. You can also supply multiple commands by separating them with a comma. As noted above this currently works in ASP.NET Core RC2 but might change when as we transition back to the .csproj file.
06 Jun 2016
At the time of writing there is no official template for integrating ASP.NET Core (RC2) with Service Fabric in a Stateless Service so I though I would dive in and see if I could get it to work by looking at the ASP.NET 4.6 Web API Template that is currently available through Visual Studio. There will be a ASP.NET Core template available eventually but I thought this would be a useful exercise to learn more about how Service Fabric integrates with frameworks like ASP.NET.
You can find the full implementation of the solution I came up with on GitHub. There were also a couple examples that I used for reference. The first was a really basic template on GitHub which I used as my starting point to creating an ASP.NET Core Communication Listener. The other was the more advance solution that shows not only how to integrate but also build an API Gateway after the Microservices Gateway pattern.
ICommunicationListener
Lets take a look at the Service Fabric’s ICommunicationListener
interface which provides a few basic benefits.
First, it allows for service communication in an agnostic manner. This means you can communicate with HTTP, UDP, or another other custom protocol you might need for your application by implementing this interface. You can even communication with more than one protocol for one service.
Another benefit it offers is allowing for your service to be moved without affecting any clients that are working with it. Any given service can move to another server because of machine failure, upgrade, resource balancing, etc., causing a change in the IP address of the actual service. By implementing this interface you are saved from having to manage any of those situations, instead Service Fabric manages it for you.
The ICommunicationListener
interface accomplishes this by registering your service with the Service Fabric Naming Service which will then keep track of the endpoint locations where the services are located. This means a client can ask the Naming Service for a service by name and will be given the correct address without the need to know which machine it is actually running on (think along the same lines as DNS).
It achieves this through a simple interface ICommunicationListener
which has three methods:
- Abort - exit immediately, cancelling current requests
- CloseAsync - stop taking any new requests, close current requests gracefully and then exit
- OpenAsync - Open listener to be able to accept and send messages
As you can see it is a fairly simple interface but is a power concept because of the ability to allow for any type of communication and even multiple protocols per service.
Building an ASP.NET Core Communication Listener
The first method we will implement is the OpenAsync
Method. In the case of the ASP.NET Core Communication Listener, this method will be responsible for starting the web service and binding it to the correct URL. But first we need to gather some information about where the service is running from Service Fabric.
Since our service could be running on any server inside our cluster we need to get some of this information from Service Fabric runtime. We use the FabricRuntime
class to get the CodePackageActivationContext
and NodeContext
which contains information like the current service protocol, current IPAddress, and port. We can get this information and format it appropriately by doing the following:
var endpoint = FabricRuntime.GetActivationContext().GetEndpoint(endpointName);
string serverUrl = $"{endpoint.Protocol}://{FabricRuntime.GetNodeContext().IPAddressOrFQDN}:{endpoint.Port}";
The endpointName
variable is being passed in from the initial creation of the service in the program.cs
file. It is any arbitrary name you decide to give the service. Take a look at how this all come together in the full solution on the GitHub repository.
Starting ASP.NET
At it’s heart ASP.NET Core is actually a command line console application. To start an ASP.NET application we use the WebHostBuilder
class. You can find an implementation of this in the ASP.NET Core RC2 template that ships with Visual Studio. We are going to use slightly different setup than that template; The main differences are that we don’t need to use IIS Integration and we need to specify the serverUrl
that we just generated with the Service Fabric runtime information:
var host = new WebHostBuilder()
.UseKestrel()
.UseContentRoot(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory())
.UseStartup<Startup>()
.UseUrls(serverUrl)
.Build();
host.Run();
Implementing Open
Now that we know have the current URL of the service and know how to start the ASP.NET server, we can finish our implementation of the OpenAsync
method.
This is just bringing together the previous two pieces and returning a server Url as a string. The return value of the OpenAsync
method will be the address that is registered with the Service Fabric Naming Service allowing for the service to move around in the case of machine failure, upgrades, etc.
Here is what the whole OpenAsync
Method looks like:
public Task<string> OpenAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var endpoint = FabricRuntime.GetActivationContext().GetEndpoint(endpointName);
string serverUrl = $"{endpoint.Protocol}://{FabricRuntime.GetNodeContext().IPAddressOrFQDN}:{endpoint.Port}";
webHost = new WebHostBuilder
.UseKestrel()
.UseContentRoot(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory())
.UseStartup<Startup>()
.UseUrls(serverUrl)
.Build();
webHost.Start();
return Task.FromResult(serverUrl);
}
Implementing Abort and Close
We still need to implement two more methods on the ICommunicationListener
before we are finished: Abort
and CloseAsync
. These are fairly simple implementations and just require us to dispose of the WebHost
object. You could get fancier and make sure all requests are handled but for right now we will just shut down the web service as that is what is done in the ASP.NET Web API template currently.
public void Abort()
{
if (webHost != null)
{
webHost.Dispose();
}
}
public Task CloseAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
if (webHost != null)
{
webHost.Dispose();
}
return Task.FromResult(true);
}
Register the Asp.Net Core Communication Listener with Service Fabric
We have created the Asp.Net Core Communication Listener but still need to register it with the StatelessService
that will be using ASP.NET. There is a method on the StatelessSerivice
Class that you can overload to return make the connection.
This is the integration point between Service Fabric and Asp.Net. In the case of Stateless service this returns the an array of ServiceInstanaceListners
.
In the StatelessService
class, override the CreateServiceInstanceListeners
:
internal sealed class WebHostingService : StatelessService
{
private readonly string _endpointName;
public WebHostingService(StatelessServiceContext serviceContext, string endpointName)
: base(serviceContext)
{
_endpointName = endpointName;
}
protected override IEnumerable<ServiceInstanceListener> CreateServiceInstanceListeners()
{
return new[] { new ServiceInstanceListener(serviceContext => new AspnetCoreCommunicationListener(_endpointName)) };
}
}
Next steps
This is a simple implementation of an Asp.net Core Communication Listener for Service Fabric. If you would like to see the full working sample, check out this GitHub repository. I have implemented everything we talked about but also started to add in the ability to unit test the AspNetCoreCommunicationListener
.
Eventually there will be a template that Visual Studio will ship with that will provide a default implementation. The defualt will be a likely good choice for getting started but this exercise of working through how to implement a ICommunicationListner
is a good introduction to the ICommunicationListener
interface and helps us better understand another aspect of the Service Fabric platform.
01 Jun 2016
I have had to start the Service Fabric Cluster Manager a few times without starting Visual Studio and deploying the application for talks or demos. Since the Cluster Manager is a separate process there is no need to run Visual Studio, simply:
- Open the Windows Run Dialog (
Windows Key + R
)
- Type
ServiceFabricLocalClusterManager.exe
and hit OK
Now your local Service Fabric Cluster is running and you can navigate to any endpoints you have exposed.